• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Gregory C. Mason

Research and teaching in public-policy

  • Publications
    • Agricultural Commentary
    • Articles (academic)
    • Chapters in Books
    • Current Research and Working Papers
    • Book Reviews
    • Technical Reports & Monographs
    • Workshops & Presentations
  • Guiding the Invisible Hand
    • Commentary
    • Israel
  • Teaching
    • Resources for students
    • Economic Analytics Using Computer Methods
    • Experiments in AI
  • ISER
  • Economic Analytics
    • Methodology Notes
  • Mincome
  • PRA INC.

Political boundaries make little sense

November 4, 2016 by Gregory Mason

I enjoy driving to Saskatchewan.  As I pass Virden, I do not need the sign welcoming me to Saskatchewan to know I am in another province.  No, I can tell by the quaint provincial costumes that so uniquely mark the provinces of Canada.  The purple hats and the lime green leggings of Saskatchewan men are a sure tip-off that I am in a different place.

This is silly of course, but the existence of provinces demanding that they have a “made in Saskatchewan energy policy” or a “made in Nova Scotia health policy” underscores the arbitrary nature of political and administrative divisions in delivering public policy for a federal state such as Canada. In most cases the boundaries we use to deliver public policy make little sense, do not align with unique needs of the population, and add administrative cost with little commensurate value.

Read Full Article

Filed Under: Op Ed