• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Gregory C. Mason

Research and teaching in public-policy

  • Publications
    • Agricultural Commentary
    • Articles (academic)
    • Chapters in Books
    • Current Research and Working Papers
    • Book Reviews
    • Technical Reports & Monographs
    • Workshops & Presentations
  • Guiding the Invisible Hand
    • Commentary
    • Israel
  • Teaching
    • Resources for students
    • Economic Analytics Using Computer Methods
    • Experiments in AI
  • ISER
  • Economic Analytics
    • Methodology Notes
  • Mincome
  • PRA INC.

Does the volatility of the Labour Force Survey render it useless as a leading indicator? (September 19)

September 20, 2018 by Gregory Mason

The recent sharp decline of 52,000 jobs in the Canadian Economy (Labour Force Survey of Canada, August 2018, raises questions about how to interpret such changes. Some commentators see the LFS as volatile and advise against reading too much into month-to-month changes. This is conventional counsel, but does this variability render it less useful as a leading indicator? Has the volatility of this economic benchmark increased? Can we process the information from the survey to offer more insight into the near-term economic prospects? And, what change in level of September employment (scheduled for early October 2018) should prompt concern that the economy is in danger?  Read More

Filed Under: Commentary